Monday, March 22, 2010

English 5365 Week 9/10 Blog Post

I have been struggling between two topics for my paper.

The first was a vague idea of the impact of graphics on the text. The easier production of quality graphics should cause authors to chose graphics over words more often than in the past.

The second topic revolves around the improvement in fast communication technologies resulting in more team-authored papers. For this one, I have done some research during the past week. John Hudson published a paper in the Journal of Economic Perspectives (Vol. 10, issue 3, pp 153-158) titled "Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics." In the Abstract, Hudson notes, "Several decades ago, the overwhelming majority of papers appearing in leading journals of economics had a single author. In 1950, for example, only 6 percent of the papers published in the Journal of Political Economy, and just 8 percent of the papers published in the American Economic Review, were written by more than one author. These figures have changed dramatically. By 1993, the proportion of multi-authored papers in these two journals had risen to 39.6 percent and 54.9 percent, respectively."

In a paper that I wrote in my first class, I looked at changes in the style of writing in papers published in Journal of the American Chemical Society over the last 120 years. I noticed that papers written in the early days of the journal were published by at most one or two authors. Now, I see papers written not only by multiple authors but also by authors from multiple locations. People from different countries collaborate on these works. Imagine how long it would take for authors from St. Jude's Children's Hospital in the U.S. to collaborate with authors in China in the days of paper proofs sent through the mail.

How does this impact style? I would think that it would have to impact style. Different author's within the same country write differently; how can we expect author's from different parts of the same country, let alone different countries to write the same. Yet, we expect team-authored papers to have cohesion and coherence. I believe that authors writing as a team must use a more generic style to achieve cohesion and coherence; if they do not, their papers lack this critical trait and become difficult to read.

Therefore, I will state that the increase speed and convenience of modern communication technology has led to an increase in the number of multi-authored papers with authors from different institution, which in turn should lead to a more generic style or, alternatively, to a lack of coherence and cohesion when the disparate styles are expressed.


3 Comments:

Blogger Gina F. said...

Interesting thesis, Jessica. In a graduate class, I've experienced having a team-authored paper lack coherence due to sequential editing and disparate styles. In post-mortem, our team recognized that team members were not working in their areas of strength, and that the best stylists read too early in the sequence and were edited by less talented stylists. The groups that held synchronous meetings seemed more successful.

March 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM  
Blogger Rich said...

Sounds like you're building on something you've been thinking about for some time. This works well. Yes, I would think there's an impact on style here, yes. Not sure that the style is any more or less generic, but it must certainly be homogenized in some way. Yes, there are more multiauthored papers, but is that also a product of increased acceptance of multi-authored texts for P&T? Or, the increased number of multipartnered grant projects?

March 28, 2010 at 3:37 PM  
Blogger Deb said...

Jessica,
Your paper topic sounds interesting. My guess is that you may find a more generic style since I would assume editors may catch problems with coherence, etc. (but maybe not). Collaboration from different institutions would seem to certainly be affected by the ability to communicate (synchronously if they choose) through technology.

April 3, 2010 at 11:04 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home